5: Learn How To Defend Yourself Without Your Gun
One of the things that law enforcement officers learn is how to respond to varying levels of real or implied violence. This response used to be called a threat matrix and it had specific responses to specific actions, and while such things have fallen out of favor with the police and been replaced with more flexible concepts, the idea that your response should be tailored to the perceived threat, is pretty much absent when it comes to "civilian" (i.e. non-uniform-wearing) gun owners. I spent a few years in the dojo learning Wado-Ryu karate. Karate taught me that the appropriate response to a threat was a punch, kick or block. When I'm in a firearms training class or shooting an IDPA match, I'm learning that the appropriate response to a violent threat is a gun. Very, very few instructors are integrating the worlds of armed and unarmed threat response for, and those that do are teaching it as an advanced course to be taught after their students have learned other techniques like accurate aimed fire. However, let's look at how an armed violent encounter progresses. In his ground-breaking and well-respected study on defensive firearms usage, Dr. Gary Kleck of Florida State University broke down what happens when firearms are used to defend a life.- Fifty-four percent of the defensive gun uses involved somebody verbally referring to the gun
- Forty-seven percent involved the gun being pointed at the criminal
- Fourteen percent involved the gun being fired at somebody with intent to stop the threat
- The offender was wounded or killed in only 8 percent of incidents studied